Sunday, April 29, 2018
WWLP Channel 22 Masslive tv appearance
Here's the link if you want to watch Belly dance: Learn this Middle Eastern expression that will get your whole body 'undulating' that was aired at noon on March 29, 2018
Thursday, April 26, 2018
Hike, Writer's Retreat and Art Reception
|
Tuesday, April 10, 2018
Will the third time be the Charm for the New Shutesbury Library?
| Seshat Goddess of Libraries |
Mirick Spear and I share a love of books and support of the library.
![]() |
| Mirick Spear- benefactor |
The MN Spear Memorial Library Building built for a population of three hundred in 1902 at a cost of $1547.61 now serves an active community more than four times the size. The library has no running water but offers access to high speed internet in a town where fewer than half the families had access in 2011. The library is charming but inadequate.
in 2001 the library building committee, in response to a small but vocal opposition withdrew their plan before town meeting could vote on it.
In 2004 land was purchased for municipal use and it was approved as a site for an eventual new library.
In 2010 the plan for a new library received 89% support at town meeting. The town's agreement to pay their share of the grant got the required 2/3 at town meeting but the ballot vote required a majority and tie vote meant forfeiting the grant .
The current Library trustees believe it is prudent to wait until 2020, hoping for a third planning grant to begin the process all over again. I am not confident the current political climate looks good for the future of money to build new libraries.
In the May 2018 Our Town Newsletter, the Trustees share a vision of an eventual new library. They explain how they will go about it differently next time.
I am still sensitive and try to avoid the library discussion but feel like the trustees are apologizing for what volunteers did well. The new library plan had a majority of support until the last vote on funding. It was complicated and the final vote lost by one. Reaching across the lines of disagreement with compassion is one of the lessons I learned in six hours of mediation with library opponent Sharon Raymond. Saying next time we will reach out more negates the good work of the volunteers. Reaching out to the pockets of community to improved communication was the first thing we did after talking to the previous building committee who said no matter what you do, there is a small group that is opposed to a new library.
I hope the trustees can convince me that waiting at least another ten years to begin building a library is a good idea. I hope they can convince me they will not be limited in their vision by people like Bill Wells who suggested the library could be built underground so you wouldn't have to to see it. I hope they will actually read the library building program and learn from the experiences of the previous two planning committees.
Headlines tell the story.
- Shutesbury Library expansion criticized Gazette April7-8, 2001
- Shutesbury puts library on hold Monday May 5, 2001Daily Hamp Gazette
- Library plans sweet reward- chocolate to lure public’s input Feb 9, 2007 Gfld Recorder
- Shutesbury Aims to jumpstart Friends group Gfld Recorder date?
- Shutesbury seeks volunteers for library facility panel The Recorder (Date?)
- 032 Deemed a fine site for Shutesbury Library Gazette 1/10/10
- Library in Wings? Forum 4/10 Gazette
- Shutesbury TM: Move ahead on a new library Gazette 5/3/10
- Shutesbury seeks state funding for a new library 2/5/11 Gazette
- Shutesbury officials submit aid request for new library project 2/8/11
- Big Step forward for Shutesbury Gazette 7/15/11
- Area libraries receive provisional state grants 7/15/12
- Area towns net 9.5 M for libraries 7/15/11 gazette
- Shutesbury takes first step in approving new library 10/26/11 Gazette
- Library override on ballot 11/11 Gazette
- Late Drive defeats Shutesbury Library ; Library rejected in Shutesbury 11/11/11 Gazette
- Shutesbury to hold second vote on library. Hearing draws 200-plus to speak for/against revote date?
- When a library becomes a lighting rod: tensions are high in Shutesbury as a showdown looms 12/10/11
- Visit our library - Margo Culley letter to ed The Recorder 12/13/11
- Shutesbury library proponents, opponents busy campaigning before revote Gazette 1/6/12
- Consultant finds no contamination at planned Shutesbury library site 1/7/12 Gazette
- Library by Numbers Gazette1/9/12
- Tie vote on Shutesbury LibraryRecorder:1/11/12 Library Limbo Gazette 1/13/12
- Yes vote breaks tie on library: SHutesbury weighs possible recount Gazette 1/18/12
- Shutesbury library vote tied again: Shutesbury recount spells defeat for library Gazette 1/26/12
- Seizing opportunity in Shutesbury Gazette 12/23/11
- The longest election 1/28/12 Gazette editorial
- Embattled Shutesbury library project forges on Gazette 1/31/12
- Shutesbury Library supporters sue town over Jan 25 recount Gazette 2/4-5/12
- State extends Shutesbury grant deadline Gazette 2/3/12
- Shutesbury library doesn’t have votes The Recorder 5/4/12
- Shutesbury Fails to break the tie: Montague Reporter 5/17/12
- Shutesbury library video gets international attention: Celebrities tweeting about it, donations come in from around the world Gazette 3/10/12
- Sides argue Shutesbury voter status 4/24/12
- Shutesbury Library supporters appeal Recorder 5/12/12Shutesbury Library: One more round Recorder 6/14/12
- Library Shelved Gazette June 30-July 1 2012
Thursday, May 25, 2017
Letter to MBLC requesting extension 1/13/12
Karen Traub, Chair, Library Trustees
January 13, 2012
Robert Maier, Director Massachusetts Board of Library Commissioners
98 North Washington Street Suite 401
Boston, Massachusetts 02114
Dear Mr. Maier,
On behalf of the Board of Trustees
of the M.N. Spear Memorial Library, I respectfully request to be placed on the
agenda for the Board of Library Commissioners meeting on February 2, 2012, with
the intention of asking the commissioners for additional time to confirm local
funding for our library construction project.
On October 25th, 2011, the Town of
Shutesbury had a special town meeting and a warrant article to appropriate the
funds needed to confirm local funding was approved by exactly the two-thirds
majority required. On November 8, 2011, a referendum to approve a
debt-exclusion override failed by a very small margin. A second referendum
election for the debt-exclusion override was held on January 10, 2012. The
result of that election has not yet been determined. The results were 522 yes
votes, 522 no votes, and one provisional ballot that has not yet been
confirmed. Eight ballots have been challenged.
Prior to the January 10th election,
significant fundraising effort was underway. More than $170,000 has already
been raised in donations and pledges. Most of these donations and pledges have
been raised in the past six months. On January 11, 2012, a 1:1 challenge gift
of $150,000 was offered to Shutesbury for the construction of a new library as
described in our application for the Massachusetts Public Library Construction
Program.
The one-room, 900 square foot, M.N.
Spear Memorial Library is 110 years old. It lacks access to water. Despite the
tiny size, it is very well used. In FY 10, our circulation was the fourth
highest in the state for towns in our population group (under 2,000).
Currently there is not an official
outcome to the election. Community support and volunteer energy are high.
Donations and pledges, including the very generous challenge gift, continue to
arrive. We are very encouraged by the possibility of raising a substantial
amount of money in the next few months.
We respectfully request an extension
of the deadline to confirm local funding until June 30, 2012.
Thank you for your consideration of
this request.
Sincerely,
Karen Traub, Chair
Trustees of the Spear Library
Wednesday, May 10, 2017
Thursday, April 27, 2017
Visioning Session-letter to the committee 4/27/17
Dear Master Plan Working Group,
I won’t be at the town visioning session this Thursday because I have dance rehearsal and frankly I've put in more than my share of hours in planning meetings that came to nothing. Twenty years of planning for a new library ended in a tie vote and a town so bitter that 5 years later some people are still too emotionally charged to discuss it. I am cautiously optimistic about the continued discussion and the progress of mediation, the group for civil communication and the visioning committee. I am glad to see the master plan will reflect the community's need to replace the little old library.
It is my hope that the town will build an energy efficient gathering place that serves our active community of library users, honors our past and is our legacy.
I want a library with a flush toilet. One with space to learn and grow. I imagine a new library as dear to us as the MN Spear; townspeople of all ages strolling or rolling along the tree lined alley from the center of town or up the hill, visiting on the welcoming front porch, birdwatching or shepherding toddlers along the cranberry lined nature trails, sitting with a book or laptop by the footbridge over the memorial rain garden or sipping tea with friends or a newspaper at the cherry table with the crystal ball feet in the local history room after a class or event. The library in my mind has a green roof and harkens to the past while looking to the future. I imagine it being built together, with Yankee ingenuity, sensibly, to last a long time.
The library offers equal access to education, cultural enrichment and inspiration.
The Library is a hospital for the soul, a candy store for the mind and the heart of the town. The library lifts us up and is a social equalizer that benefits the poorest the most. The tiny MN Spear is charming but inadequate and has served the town that didn't pay to build it for more than a century. It's time for the little library to grow up with the nourishing support of townspeople.
I believe if we pool our talents in a shared vision we will build a sensible and inspiring library for us and our children and grandchildren.
Thanks for your good work and for welcoming community input.
Karen
PS: In response to the alternative facts that there was not community involvement in the planning process here is a library timeline.
1995Library Director Linda Pryblo identifies need for more
space
1996 Building committee formed to investigate ways to increase space
2001 Plan is withdrawn at town meeting due to opposition from a small but vocal group. Committee decides to work on plan to increase community support
2004- Lot 032 gets town meeting approval and is purchased for municipal use
2005 Friends of the Library roundtable
2006 Friends of the Library Chocolate Party to brainstorm ideas for library future
2007 Long Range Plan reflects need for more space
2007 Shutesbury voters approve applying for a second Planning & Design Grant.
2007-2010The Library Trustees formed the Library Facility Needs Assessment Committee (LFNAC) consisting of Library Trustees, Library Director, representatives from town committees and residents.
The Committee reviewed the current building against building codes, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements and recommended library space standards, evaluated the current facility’s ability to meet the goals of the library’s Long Range Plan, solicited opinions from residents. A survey was widely distributed soliciting opinions. The committee identified pockets within the Shutesbury community such as the elementary school, Shutesbury Athletic Club, Lake Wyola and Sirius community, and reached out via phone, in person, at every town event, held forums at the town hall, elementary school and Sirius community. The committee reviewed the work of the 1995 library building committee and visited newly constructed or expanded libraries including neighboring Wendell, New Salem, and Leverett and shared its findings in powerpoint shown at town meeting and other events.
With an overwhelming 89% approval from town meeting in 2010, the committee submitted and was awarded a grant to build a new library.
2011 Two thirds majority at town meeting approved
Ballot vote was a tie and after vigorous fundraising failed when a large pledge was withdrawn, the grant was forfeited to another town
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


